



DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel Rail
Marsoni
M251S
Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping.
Friday, May 29
DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel RailNissan SR20 S13 Top feed Conversion Fuel Rail for 1991 97 Nissan 180SX, 1991 93 Nissan Silvia, 1989 93 Nissan 240SX This Part Fits: Year Make Model Submodel 1991 1993 Nissan 240SX Base 1991 1992 Nissan 240SX LE 1989 1993 Nissan 240SX SE 1989 1990 Nissan 240SX XE
Quick Dispatch:
Your DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel Rail orders ship within 1-2 business days.
Delivery Options:
- Standard: 3-7 business days
- Fast: 2-3 business days
- Express: 1-2 business days
Order Tracking:
You'll receive a tracking link by email once your DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel Rail ships.
Need Help?
Questions about DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel Rail, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.
Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for DeatschWerks Nissan SR20 S13 Top Feed Conversion Fuel Rail in your area.
Get Shipping Estimates
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
You may also like
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 158 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 3
Light and comfortable, didn't hold up for a full season
Size: 11.5, Color: Black
Pros:boots were extremely light and comfortable.
Cons: if you work in rocky areas like northern California you will only get 1/2-1 season on these. Mine lasted 6 months then the fabric ripped, the soles had holes all the way through to the middle, and the tread wore down til they were smooth slick rubber.
If they cost $150-$175 I'd buy 2 pairs a season but at over $300 a pair there are much better options
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on July 11, 2021
★★★★★ 1
True advertisement
Size: 11, Color: Black
I just purchased these boots 09/03/25 , let's see what these reviews are about? Why isn't their a direct website for the company? Quality and Durability.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 5, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Nice boot!!
Size: 8.5, Color: Black
Very comfortable. Built well and obviously high quality. Fits a little big, about a size larger. They are a little thinner/cooler than the Danner Wildland and Haix Missoula. They do not have any NFPA rated tags or labels on the boot. Will upgrade the laces. Would love to see the boa system on this boot!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 2, 2020
★★★★★ 2
Needs work
Size: 12, Color: Black
I’m disappointed that I spent almost 400$ on a pair of boots and wore them for 3 days and both boot laces broke near the eyelets. As a wildland firefighter I need to be able to rely on my boots.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 6, 2020
★★★★★ 5
Like all Asics I've owned - Good
Size: 12 X-Wide, Color: Steel Grey/Cloud Grey
I've worn Asics for about 35 years now. Every pair I've had, and there have been many, have fit well and gotten the job done. The Gel-Venture 11 are performing as expected which is very well. The cushioning and support in the heel and arch are excellent. Very comfortable to walk and run in these shoes. Finally, and less importantly, the looks are just OK. The cheap "iron on" Asics logo doesn't look good. I've been purchasing Asics for as long as I have strictly for the performance quality anyway.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026